|
Category
|
Exemplary
4
|
Accomplished
3
|
Developing
2
|
Beginning
1
|
Score
|
|
Content
|
Covers topic in depth. Elaborates
throughout. Subject knowledge is evident (more than
required)
|
Includes essential information.
Subject knowledge is evident in much of the
product.
|
Fulfills minimal topic requirements.
Some subject knowledge is evident, but some is incorrect or
confusing
|
Subject knowledge is not evident.
Information is confusing, incorrect, or
flawed.
|
|
|
Mechanics
|
Presentation has no misspellings or
grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has fewer than two
misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has three or more
misspellings or grammatical errors
|
Presentation has four or more
spelling or grammatical errors.
|
|
|
Oral
Presentation
|
Uses original approach effectively.
Highly organized. Well rehearsed. Ease in
delivery.
|
Interesting. Logical order. Fluid
delivery. Good use of delivery techniques.
|
Clear and understandable. Uses
appropriate language. Uses limited delivery
techniques.
|
No logical sequence of events. No
evidence of delivery techniques.
|
|
|
Originality
|
Product shows evidence of original
thought. Ideas are inventive and based on logical
conclusions and sound research.
|
Product shows original thought. Work
extends beyond other people's ideas and shows new
insights,
|
This work is a rather large
collection and rehash of other people's ideas. There is no
evidence of new thought or inventiveness.
|
This work is minimal collection and
rehash of other people's ideas. There is no evidence of new
thought.
|
|
|
Teamwork
|
The work load was divided and shared
equally by all team members.
|
Most team members contributed their
fair share of the work.
|
Most team members participated in
some aspect of the work, but workloads
varied.
|
The work load was not divided
equally and few team members contributed their fair
share.
|
|